TL;DR
The legal spat between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to be among the most intriguing topics in the crypto space. It dates back to December 2020 when the regulator sued the company, accusing it of illegally raising more than $1.3 billion in an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP.
The parties fired numerous shots at each other in the following years, with the advantage going from one side to the other. According to some industry participants, Ripple currently has the upper hand after securing three vital (yet partial) court wins.
In July last year, Judge Torres ruled that the firm’s programmatic sales to secondary trading platforms do not constitute offers of investment contracts. The decision was followed by a bull run for XRP, whose price shot by over 70% in the span of 24 hours.
The magistrates later dismissed the SEC’s intentions to appeal the ruling, while Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen were cleared of all charges brought by the agency.
The case entered its trial phase in April this year, but instead of a final agreement, it offered additional confrontation. Ripple recently pointed to Judge Amy Jackson’s decision to dismiss the SEC’s claims that secondary market sales of Binance’s BNB token constituted securities transactions.
The company’s defense filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority, arguing that the ruling supports its case that the alleged illegal sales of XRP do not warrant “harsh remedies.”
The Commission was quick to react, filing an official response on July 3. It maintained that the case against Binance is “wholly irrelevant” to the one against Ripple.
Ripple’s potential fine has become another bone of contention in the lawsuit. The SEC initially sought a staggering $2 billion penalty, while the company insisted on a sum no larger than $10 million.
Ripple compared the lawsuit with the one between the watchdog and Terraform Labs, saying direct allegations of fraud were only evident in the one against the defunct crypto company.
Shortly after, the SEC softened its tone, proposing a $102.6 million penalty:
Even though the case is in its final stage, an outcome might be prolonged indefinitely due to the complexity of the legal process and possible appeals from both sides.
However, some optimists believe an agreement might occur in the following weeks. One example is the American attorney Fred Rispoli. He outlined July 31 as a possible date, predicting the resolution would include a penalty of no more than $25 million for Ripple and $0 disgorgement.
The post Ripple v SEC Lawsuit Update July 11 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
- Ripple has achieved significant partial legal victories in its ongoing battle with the SEC throughout 2023.
- The potential penalty remains disputed, with the SEC proposing $102.6 million and the company arguing for a maximum of $10 million.
Filing After Filing
The legal spat between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to be among the most intriguing topics in the crypto space. It dates back to December 2020 when the regulator sued the company, accusing it of illegally raising more than $1.3 billion in an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP.
The parties fired numerous shots at each other in the following years, with the advantage going from one side to the other. According to some industry participants, Ripple currently has the upper hand after securing three vital (yet partial) court wins.
In July last year, Judge Torres ruled that the firm’s programmatic sales to secondary trading platforms do not constitute offers of investment contracts. The decision was followed by a bull run for XRP, whose price shot by over 70% in the span of 24 hours.
The magistrates later dismissed the SEC’s intentions to appeal the ruling, while Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman Chris Larsen were cleared of all charges brought by the agency.
The case entered its trial phase in April this year, but instead of a final agreement, it offered additional confrontation. Ripple recently pointed to Judge Amy Jackson’s decision to dismiss the SEC’s claims that secondary market sales of Binance’s BNB token constituted securities transactions.
The company’s defense filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority, arguing that the ruling supports its case that the alleged illegal sales of XRP do not warrant “harsh remedies.”
The Commission was quick to react, filing an official response on July 3. It maintained that the case against Binance is “wholly irrelevant” to the one against Ripple.
The Possible Penalty
Ripple’s potential fine has become another bone of contention in the lawsuit. The SEC initially sought a staggering $2 billion penalty, while the company insisted on a sum no larger than $10 million.
Ripple compared the lawsuit with the one between the watchdog and Terraform Labs, saying direct allegations of fraud were only evident in the one against the defunct crypto company.
Shortly after, the SEC softened its tone, proposing a $102.6 million penalty:
Is a Resolution Incoming?
Even though the case is in its final stage, an outcome might be prolonged indefinitely due to the complexity of the legal process and possible appeals from both sides.
However, some optimists believe an agreement might occur in the following weeks. One example is the American attorney Fred Rispoli. He outlined July 31 as a possible date, predicting the resolution would include a penalty of no more than $25 million for Ripple and $0 disgorgement.
The post Ripple v SEC Lawsuit Update July 11 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
![[DK]](/data/avatars/s/57/57999.jpg?1720990206){kind=avatar}
