Crypto industry veterans and investors are debating whether Bitcoin (BTC) or MicroStrategy (MSTR) is a better buy following several weeks of stellar performance for both assets.
Since the start of the year, Bitcoin has rallied 54% on the back of massive demand for newly launched Bitcoin ETFs, whose shares have appreciated at the same rate as the underlying coin. MicroStrategy, however â the company owned by Bitcoin billionaire Michael Saylor â has risen 155% in that same time.
MicroStrategy is the worldâs largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. The asset comprises virtually all of the companyâs balance sheet, which today carries 205,000 BTC â nearly 1% of all BTC that will ever exist.
Many including Saylor himself have likened the company to a Bitcoin spot ETF with the advantage of having no management fee. Proponents, however, note a slew of other advantages â namely its ability to deploy cheap, long-term debt to gather more BTC.
âEvery time MSTR does a leverage buy on cheap financing the valuation will boost, so itâs already acting like a levered BTC long,â explained Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo in an X post on Thursday. These purchases effectively boost shareholdersâ âBTC per share,â a metric that stays essentially flat in standard Bitcoin ETFs run by BlackRock and Grayscale.
Such debt is also far cheaper than what normal people can access.
While the Federal Reserveâs benchmark rate currently exceeds 5%, and crypto markets are lending stablecoins at over 10%, MicroStrategyâs latest convertible note sales offer a mere 0.6% and 0.8% interest rate. The debt on both loans â which are cumulatively $1.2 billion â isnât due to be paid back until 2030.
Bitcoin OG Adam Back says MSTR has other methods of acquiring more BTC, including selling bonds, or selling more company shares. The latter method is effective at reducing the companyâs debt ratio, and has even proven to increase shareholderâs BTC per share.
Like any company, MicroStrategy still carries corporate risk next to actual Bitcoin, since management may choose to change directions on its Bitcoin strategy. Some part of its valuation is also based on its pre-existing software business, which isnât guaranteed to be profitable in the future.
Since the start of the year, Saylor has been selling his shares in MSTR to purchase more BTC, which critics view as a lack of conviction in his own company compared to Bitcoin itself.
The post Is MicroStrategy (MSTR) A Better Investment Than Bitcoin? Experts Debate appeared first on CryptoPotato.
Since the start of the year, Bitcoin has rallied 54% on the back of massive demand for newly launched Bitcoin ETFs, whose shares have appreciated at the same rate as the underlying coin. MicroStrategy, however â the company owned by Bitcoin billionaire Michael Saylor â has risen 155% in that same time.
Comparing Bitcoin to MicroStrategy
MicroStrategy is the worldâs largest corporate holder of Bitcoin. The asset comprises virtually all of the companyâs balance sheet, which today carries 205,000 BTC â nearly 1% of all BTC that will ever exist.
Many including Saylor himself have likened the company to a Bitcoin spot ETF with the advantage of having no management fee. Proponents, however, note a slew of other advantages â namely its ability to deploy cheap, long-term debt to gather more BTC.
âEvery time MSTR does a leverage buy on cheap financing the valuation will boost, so itâs already acting like a levered BTC long,â explained Bitcoin analyst Willy Woo in an X post on Thursday. These purchases effectively boost shareholdersâ âBTC per share,â a metric that stays essentially flat in standard Bitcoin ETFs run by BlackRock and Grayscale.
Such debt is also far cheaper than what normal people can access.
While the Federal Reserveâs benchmark rate currently exceeds 5%, and crypto markets are lending stablecoins at over 10%, MicroStrategyâs latest convertible note sales offer a mere 0.6% and 0.8% interest rate. The debt on both loans â which are cumulatively $1.2 billion â isnât due to be paid back until 2030.
Bitcoin OG Adam Back says MSTR has other methods of acquiring more BTC, including selling bonds, or selling more company shares. The latter method is effective at reducing the companyâs debt ratio, and has even proven to increase shareholderâs BTC per share.
âBetween now and hyperbitcoinization can they double the BTC held and more? answer I think, yes probably,â he wrote.
Advantages of Real Bitcoin
Like any company, MicroStrategy still carries corporate risk next to actual Bitcoin, since management may choose to change directions on its Bitcoin strategy. Some part of its valuation is also based on its pre-existing software business, which isnât guaranteed to be profitable in the future.
Since the start of the year, Saylor has been selling his shares in MSTR to purchase more BTC, which critics view as a lack of conviction in his own company compared to Bitcoin itself.
âIf Saylor thought MSTR was a good investment, heâd be doing stock buybacks instead of selling it to buy more bitcoin,â wrote Pledditor on Friday.
The post Is MicroStrategy (MSTR) A Better Investment Than Bitcoin? Experts Debate appeared first on CryptoPotato.