Welcome to the Off-Shore Club

The #1 Social Engineering Project in the world since 2004 !

Important Notice:

āœ…UPGRADE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY TO ACCESS ALL OFF-SHORE FORUMSāœ…

[New]Telegram Channel

In case our domain name changes, we advise you to subscribe to our new TG channel to always be aware of all events and updates -
https://t.me/rtmsechannel

OFF-SHORE Staff Announcement: 30% Bonus on ALL Wallet Deposit this week


For example, if you deposit $1000, your RTM Advertising Balance will be $1300 that can be used to purchase eligible products and service on forums or request withdrawal. The limit deposit to get the 30% bonus is $10,000 for a $3000 Marketplace wallet balance Bonus.

Deposit Now and claim 30% more balance ! - BTC/LTC/XMR


Always use a Mixer to keep Maximum anonimity ! - BTC to BTC or BTC to XMR

šŸš€ Crypto Important Ripple v SEC Update July 3

āš ļøAlways Remember to keep your identity safe by using a Zero-KYC Zero-AML like https://coinshift.moneyāš ļø

Gold

Gr@c3

Holy HOLDER
šŸš€ Crypto ā‚æOP Club
USDT(TRC-20)
$3,000.0
TL;DR

  • Ripple uses a recent Binance ruling to argue against harsh penalties in their SEC lawsuit, citing regulatory uncertainty.
  • The agency has reduced its proposed penalty from $2 billion to $102.6 million, while the company argues for a maximum fine of $10 million.



Ripple on the Move​


The legal confrontation between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has witnessed numerous developments as of late.

Most recently, the company filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority regarding a recent decision related to crypto exchange Binance. Last week, Judge Amy Jackson dismissed the regulatorā€™s claims that secondary market sales of Binanceā€™s BNB token constituted securities transactions.

Ripple seemingly intends to use that ruling in its favor. The firmā€™s legal counsel, Michael Kellogg, argued that the recent magistratesā€™ decision supports Rippleā€™s case that its alleged illegal sales of XRP do not warrant ā€œharsh remediesā€ as the agency claims.

ā€œThis observation supports Rippleā€™s argument that providing clarity on the legality of the different types of sales of XRP was the most significant aspect of the Courtā€™s summary judgment decisionā€¦

The lack of regulatory clarity prior to that ruling, in turn, supports Rippleā€™s position that the Courtā€™s finding of a strict liability violation on some of Rippleā€™s sales ā€“ but far fewer than the SEC alleged were violations ā€“ does not reflect reckless disregard for the law or warrant harsh remedies. And, of course, the SEC did not even allege recklessness as to Ripple in its Complaint,ā€ the letter reads.

Developments surrounding the longstanding lawsuit between the company and Americaā€™s securities regulator have often reflected on XRPā€™s market performance. The tokenā€™s price headed north following the filed letter and remains slightly in the green on a daily scale. In comparison, other leading cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), have tanked substantially in the past 24 hours.

The Bone of Contention​


One of the major issues related to the caseā€™s possible resolution is the size of Rippleā€™s penalty. The SEC initially sought a staggering $2 billion fine, while the firm claimed the amount should not exceed $10 million.

Ripple compared the lawsuit with the one between the regulator and Terraform Labs, saying direct allegations of fraud were only evident in the one against the defunct crypto company.

Shortly after, the SEC softened its tone, proposing a $102.6 million penalty:

ā€œRipple avoids comparing the Terraform settlementā€™s penalty to the gross profit of the violative conduct. That ratio ($420 million/$3.587 billion) is significantly higher: 11.7%. Applying it to the $876.3 million in gross profits, the SEC here asks the court to disgorge, which results in a much larger figure, a $102.6 million penalty, than the $10 million ceiling Ripple insists on.ā€







The post Important Ripple v SEC Update July 3 appeared first on CryptoPotato.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Friendly Disclaimer We do not host or store any files on our website except thread messages, most likely your DMCA content is being hosted on a third-party website and you need to contact them. Representatives of this site ("service") are not responsible for any content created by users and for accounts. The materials presented express only the opinions of their authors.
šŸšØ Do not get Ripped Off ! āš–ļø Deal with approved sellers or use RTM Escrow on Telegram
Gold
Mitalk.lat official Off Shore Club Chat


Gold

Panel Title #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Panel Title #2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Top